Public Models / Publication
Aegean Blue
Aromatics SaaS company
Use these assumptions
Copy link
Focus sentinelFocus sentinel
Report “Aegean Blue”
Incremental AI cost: £4,392.00 per year. These are two different valuations of the same output gain. Do not add them together. Neither value is a guaranteed minimum or maximum.
Capacity-based value
The cost of the engineer time used for more work. It is not a cash saving.
£70,200.00 per year · ROI 1,498.36%
Revenue-linked value
A hypothetical contribution scenario. It is not a sales forecast.
£167,142.86 per year · ROI 3,705.62%
Inputs - company
Item | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue, last completed financial year | £12,000,000.00 | Your figure |
| Business-as-usual revenue growth | 0.00% | Illustrative, not validated |
| Incremental contribution margin | 50.00% | Your figure |
Inputs - workforce
Item | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering FTE (annual average) | 15 | Your figure |
| Licensed seats (annual average) | 10.5 | — |
Inputs - AI tool costs
Item | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Engineers with a paid seat | 70.00% | Illustrative, not validated |
| Seat price per month | £22.00 | Your figure |
| Extra usage per active engineer per month | £15.00 | Illustrative, not validated |
| Implementation, training and governance (year one) | £0.00 | Illustrative, not validated |
Inputs - productivity and adoption
Item | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering work eligible for AI | 80.00% | Your figure |
| Net time saved on eligible work | 20.00% | Illustrative, not validated |
| Active engineers (adoption) | 60.00% | Illustrative, not validated |
| Released time used for extra output (redeployment) | 50.00% | Illustrative, not validated |
Inputs - commercial response
Item | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering commercial response | 65.00% | Illustrative, not validated |
| Commercial diffusion loss | 25.00% | Illustrative, not validated |
| Downside commercial transmission | 100.00% | Illustrative, not validated |
Workforce cohorts
Location | Seniority | FTE | Fully loaded cost (original currency) | FX rate | Rate date | FX source | Loaded cost (GBP) | Capacity benefit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK | junior | 0 | £52,000.00 | 1 | — | reporting currency (no conversion) | £52,000.00 | £0.00 |
| UK | mid | 7.5 | £78,000.00 | 1 | — | reporting currency (no conversion) | £78,000.00 | £28,080.00 |
| UK | senior | 7.5 | £117,000.00 | 1 | — | reporting currency (no conversion) | £117,000.00 | £42,120.00 |
Incremental annual AI cost
Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Licences | £2,772.00 |
| Additional usage | £1,620.00 |
| Implementation, training and governanceExcluded (set to 0) - not a claim that deployment is free | £0.00 |
| Total incremental AI cost | £4,392.00 |
Productivity chain
Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Active engineers (annual average) | 9 |
| Released time per active engineer | 16.0000% |
| Theoretical output uplift per active engineer | 19.0476% |
| Released baseline time, whole workforce | 9.6000% |
| Realised workforce output uplift | 5.7143% |
| Adverse output change (stress channel) | 0.0000% |
Capacity-based value
Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Capacity benefit (cost-equivalent of redeployed time)Not a cash or payroll saving | £70,200.00 |
| Net value after AI cost | £65,808.00 |
| Capacity economic ROI | 1,498.36% |
| Benefit / cost | 15.98× |
Revenue-linked contribution value (scenario)
Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Forecast BAU revenue (no AI) | £12,000,000.00 |
| Incremental revenue scenarioScenario, not a sales forecast | £334,285.71 |
| Incremental contribution benefit | £167,142.86 |
| Net value after AI cost | £162,750.86 |
| Commercial scenario ROI | 3,705.62% |
| Benefit / cost | 38.06× |
| Effective commercial response e × (1 − d) | 48.7500% |
Diagnostics (calculated by the model, not audited)
Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Engineering-addressable contribution per FTE | £260,000.00 |
| BAU revenue at which the two valuations are equalNeither valuation is a fixed minimum or maximum | £5,040,000.00 |
Sensitivity - net time saved on eligible work ±10 points
Scenario | Shift | Capacity benefit | Capacity ROI | Commercial benefit | Commercial ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative | -10% | £35,100.00 | 699.18% | £76,304.35 | 1,637.35% |
| Base | 0% | £70,200.00 | 1,498.36% | £167,142.86 | 3,705.62% |
| Optimistic | 10% | £105,300.00 | 2,297.54% | £277,105.26 | 6,209.32% |
Reproducibility
Reproduced exactly by the current engine (0.1.3). Input hash 8459065fb9cce516…, output hash eeace6463a136d4d….
- Capacity-based and revenue-linked values are two alternative valuations of the same output gain. Never add them.
- Neither valuation is a guaranteed minimum or maximum; which one is higher depends on the inputs.
- Capacity value is the cost-equivalent of redeployed engineer time, not a payroll or cash saving.
- Revenue-linked value is a hypothetical scenario based on stated assumptions, not a causal sales forecast.
- Illustrative estimate - not an observed financial result until supported by evidence.
- Dodone Model v1 is a controlled draft for independent methodological audit; it has not been audited.
- One 12-month period; a new AI tool compared with no tool. Not valid for replacing an existing AI tool.